In article , Max Demian
wrote:
On 16/06/2018 20:11, Rod Speed wrote:


"charles" wrote in message
...
In article , Johnny B Good
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 16:35:21 +0100, Brian-Gaff wrote:

I think ink jet and cheap are two words not often in the same
sentence these days and of course use any make you like but not
Epsom. the
local
tip is piled high with cheap epson printers and broken lexmark
ones. Brian

I'd expect to see evidence of imprint marks from the soles of size 9
work boots on many of the 'broken' Lexmark printers (and probably
likewise the 'cheap' Epson printers[1]). :-)

[1] Actually (let's be all inclusive, why not?) and say *all* 'cheap'
inkjet printers. The ink jet 'principle' was a nice idea... in
principle but, in practice for occasional home use, it was one with a
very obvious and glaring flaw which I don't need to spell out to
anyone who has ever owned one.

Interesting. Epson have gone over entirely to inkjet printers.

Weird, hadn't noticed that. Maybe its just the way the Japs do things,
make the brand specific to the type of product and so do the lasers
under the Brother brand instead.

Yeah like sweet biscuit are McVities and savoury ones are Jacobs (same
manufacturer).

when I was young these biscuits were made by separate companies. I even
knew a young lady from the McVitie family.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle