On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 15:38:56 +0100, Bob F wrote:

On 4/29/2018 7:22 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 14:43:18 +0100, dpb wrote:

On 4/29/2018 8:36 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
...

So it wasn't really necessary to have it there.

Insurance is only necessary after the fire, too...

Insurance is a con. Remember, insurance companies make a profit....


Only if you can afford to rebuild your house after the fire without
insurance.

But it's not likely to happen. Look at the odds. What percentage of the value of your house do you pay to the insurance company? Now on average they make a profit, so the chances of actually needing a full payout must be virtually nothing.

--
Mary's lamb had foot and mouth.
The vet he came and shot it.
But Mary's Dad had shagged it twice.
And now her Mum has got it.