On 08/04/2018 11:10, Fredxx wrote:
On 08/04/2018 10:28, Robin wrote:
On 08/04/2018 09:50, ARW wrote:
Four?

Nope it is 4.

Just had to prove that I was a human to send off a submission on a
website and that was their question and answer.

Anyone else agree that the answer is four and not 4?


Yes. Although they ought to have had the nous to program it to accept
either.Â* And perhaps, if they'd had real style, to accept also eleven
(11) or ten (10)

Or being programmers, they might take that to mean three and two
respectively?


Asking "what is two + two" and then assuming any answer *must* be binary
would be stupid even by their standards.


--
Robin
reply-to address is (intended to be) valid