On 18/03/18 11:00, Andrew wrote:
On 17/03/2018 14:54, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 17/03/18 14:51, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:27:48 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
Â*Â* Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:32:54 +0000, GB wrote:

You seem to be pleased these guys are out of work.

Maybe he's just pleased that a company that can't compete without
state
aid will no longer be a burden on the taxpayer's teat?

Remind us how much taxpayer's money is going to go into Hinkley
Point? And
care to guess how much the costs will overrun by? And how much
electricity
consumers will be subsidising its cost through higher charges?

Rather less than is going into renewables, that's for sure, and it'll
last a deal sight longer.

And generate a **** sight more electricity



Possibly. One day. If it ever gets completed, since the evidence
of it's siblings in France and Finland doesn't look hopeful.

Whereas its siblings in the far east are on time and on budget.

Tell you anything about EU overregulation, and anti-nuclear greenery?


Why can't we just build some more like Sizewell ?.

EU nuclear ovverregulation



--
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign,
that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."

Jonathan Swift.