On Saturday, 17 March 2018 15:59:34 UTC, charles wrote:
In article , The Natural Philosopher
wrote:
On 17/03/18 14:09, Ian wrote:
On 17/03/2018 13:56, Richard wrote:
On 17/03/18 13:24, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:32:54 +0000, GB wrote:

You seem to be pleased these guys are out of work.

Maybe he's just pleased that a company that can't compete without
state aid will no longer be a burden on the taxpayer's teat?

+1

You'll agree rail subsidies should be removed.

And road subsidies.

Inn fact if we removed ALL subsidies we would after a period of intense
turbulence emerge as a far more efficeint society.

a way to much reduce the turbulence would be to withdraw them very slowly

I suppose if "subsidies" include the NHS, there'd be a lot less people
around

that's one case where it would be counterproductive. A much less healthy workforce means less productivity. So even economically it makes no sense, before looking at the moral/wellbeing side of it.

School is another. 3rd world countries not eduating their citizens results in a less productive citizenry/workforce.


NT