Oh dear. How sad. Never mind.
On 17/03/18 16:21, Huge wrote:
On 2018-03-17, charles wrote:
In article , The Natural Philosopher
wrote:
On 17/03/18 14:09, Ian wrote:
On 17/03/2018 13:56, Richard wrote:
On 17/03/18 13:24, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:32:54 +0000, GB wrote:
You seem to be pleased these guys are out of work.
Maybe he's just pleased that a company that can't compete without
state aid will no longer be a burden on the taxpayer's teat?
+1
You'll agree rail subsidies should be removed.
And road subsidies.
Inn fact if we removed ALL subsidies we would after a period of intense
turbulence emerge as a far more efficeint society.
I suppose if "subsidies" include the NHS, there'd be a lot less people
around
"fewer".
You're welcome.
Thanks. Saved me doing it.
|