In article , T i m
writes
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:34:49 -0000, "tim..."
wrote:



"dennis@home" wrote in message
...
On 14/03/2018 23:27, T i m wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 22:26:50 +0000, bert wrote:

snip

I guess there are times when being in a gang can have it's advantages,
especially in these unstable times?


It's called NATO
Rule no 1
An attack on a member is considered an attack on all.

Hey, we are contributing more than other countries, we want out (don't
we?) as that money could go on the NHS instead?

That is why the UK wants an EU army so we don't have to rely on NATO for

except that the UK wants an EU army like a hole in the head

Is this 'in your opinion' as I'm not sure I was ever asked either way
and can you cite any facts to back up your comment?

(I know facts aren't the 'Brexiteer Way') [1]

Cheers, T i m

I note you didn't ask the same question of the previous assertion by
Denise that the UK wanted an EU army. Typical remoaner cherry picking.
[1] That could be the new name for the motorway we are going to be
converting into a lorry park once the customs border goes back up.
Rubbish. Go look at the US/Canadian border.
--
bert