On Saturday, March 10, 2018 at 3:45:02 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 16:21:04 +0000 (UTC), "Dove Tail"
wrote:

On 3/10/2018 at 8:02:32 AM, wrote:


On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 15:39:02 +0000 (UTC), "Dove Tail"
wrote:

On 3/10/2018 at 7:32:39 AM, wrote:


On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 11:34:57 +0000 (UTC), "Dove Tail"
wrote:

2nd Amendment Scoreboard


https://imgur.com/a/Md1Mo

I suppose the 1st amendment score card would be all of the deaths,
injuries and property damage caused by "protesters" (AKA rioters)


You work on that while I focus on the 2nd amendment. Maybe you can
draw or find a cartoon to illustrate your point?

You should not have any problem finding pictures of burned out cities
from the last 50 years of "protests".



As I said, you get to work on that while I focus on the 2nd amendment.

The point is they did not rank the rights, they all have the same
importance, no matter what the collateral damage might be.
In the 70s the court even gutted the principle of crying fire in a
crowded theater. Even the most devisive and violence inciting speech
is protected. I suppose you still think the 1st amendment is
important.

Last time I checked, yelling fire in a crowded theater is still illegal and nothing changed that. I'd like to see some people bring some hate crime cases to the SC, because there are freedom of speech issues with many of those laws. I'd say if anything, free speech is more restricted today than it was 50 or 100 years ago.