On 10/03/18 14:16, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Richard wrote:
Yet you chose to attack DPD in your initial post?

You a shareholder then? Or suddenly terribly concerned about hurting
feelings?

Not a shareholder. Simply outing you for being disingenuous.

You've not read and understood this tread then? That it was a con?
Perhaps you think the likes of DPD hang on your every word and deserve an
apology?

Thread.
I responded early on to your initial bitchy whiney post, requesting the
link. It was obvious to anyone (almost) that it was a phishing attempt.