On Monday, 5 March 2018 13:37:54 UTC, charles wrote:
In article ,
dennis@home wrote:
On 05/03/2018 10:29, Tim Watts wrote:
On 05/03/18 09:37, dennis@home wrote:

I think its called the bible.

In it it describes how some bloke should go and ask a king for his
people to be freed from slavery (which they weren't in the first
place) but he will harden the king's heart so he doesn't release them
from slavery. This god then brings down plagues and such stuff to kill
millions just because he feels like it as the god could just as easily
softened the kings heart in the first place.

You forgot Noah...

Well yes, a global flood would cause mass extinction amongst aquatic
life and Noah didn't save any fish or stuff like that.


why would aquatic life be made extinct by a flood? They'd love it.

Not all water is the same (fresh/salt) or at the same temperature and even fish have to eat so it would depend on whether the plankton or what they eat has also survived.

It's
the not-saving of the unicorns that was the real disaster.

We did but they were far too tasty even without ketchup.
You do know noah took more than two sheep he took seven sheep as he liked kebabs and for 40 days & nights .......well the reast is history.






--
from KT24 in Surrey, England