On 3/3/2018 8:54 AM, Dove Tail wrote:
dvus wrote:

Do you have evidence he wasn't ordered to not go in? I don't know
either way yet, so I'm willing to wait until the evidence is in.


If "you don't know either way yet", then why did you write
"Complain to the guy who told them not to go in"?

Because all the reports I've seen or heard indicate that the deputies
were told to "stage" outside and wait for SWAT. My comment was based
on those reports but I'm willing to alter them if evidence appears
that contradicts what I wrote. I wish the Liberals/Socialists would
take the same path and change their minds about anything when
evidence shows them to be wrong but that never happens.


Can you provide a link to reports which indicate Peterson was ordered
to not enter the school? I have not seen any such reports.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/28...urces-say.html

http://video.foxnews.com/v/574305605...#sp=show-clips

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crim...icle-1.3851396

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ers-stage.html

https://www.opslens.com/2018/03/01/b...urders-ensued/

Is that sufficient? I didn't read them all but you can get the gist.

Of course it is based upon facts. He failed to do his job, then,
instead of facing an investigation and discipline, he resigned
immediately after the incident.

There will still be an investigation and hopefully the facts will
emerge. If the officer was derelict he may lose his pension.

Civil service benefits do not work that way.

If true that's a shame. There should be consequences for dereliction of
duty. If he was told to "stand down" then that's a different situation.

--
dvus