dvus wrote:

On 3/1/2018 6:47 AM, Dove Tail wrote:
dvus wrote:

On 2/28/2018 8:53 AM, Dove Tail wrote:
dvus wrote:

Yes, that's why intelligent people want armed protection for
them in the future. I don't expect you to understand the
premise.


They had "armed protection" and it was completely worthless.

Complain to the guy who told them not to go in, whomever that was.


DO you have evidence that the school safety officer was ordered to
not go in to the school? I think not, he was too busy worrying
about his retirement and didn't give a hoot about the children
citizens he was tasked with protecting.

Do you have evidence he wasn't ordered to not go in? I don't know
either way yet, so I'm willing to wait until the evidence is in.


If "you don't know either way yet", then why did you write "Complain to
the guy who told them not to go in"?

The question is rhetorical, no need to answer.



He should have never been a sworn officer, he was better suited to
being a meter maid.

Statement not based on facts.


Of course it is based upon facts. He failed to do his job, then,
instead of facing an investigation and discipline, he resigned
immediately after the incident.



--
"In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place."

"Truth Sounds Like Hate To Those Who Hate The Truth"