In article ,
T i m wrote:
Not quite sure why you included (union) there as it's rather irrelevant.

Because it was effectively the union that set the pace in that case?

I'd be most surprised if the likes of Scargill got involved in such
things. ;-)

It will have been agreed at local level. Not 'set' by the union.

It is in a union's interests - ie the interests of its members - to have
high efficiency in any workplace. Provided those workers also benefit from
working at high productivity.

--
*I brake for no apparent reason.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.