On 20/02/2018 16:23, whisky-dave wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 16:03:33 UTC, dennis@home wrote:
On 19/02/2018 23:09, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:


There have been several surveys asking the tube users if they want
driverless trains. And the answer is always a decisive no. But hey -
they're only the tube users who pay for it. Far more important to keep the
likes of pamela happy.


If only the tube user paid for it then we would be happy and they would
be broke.

Far too much public money is spent on London and the SE compared to
elsewhere.

What do you think the roads would be like if the tube trains suddently stopped, you can see what happens on tube strikes would you really want the roads conjetsed like they are on strike days ?

They would be bad for a week and then people would catch the bus or use
trains.


Anyway why should us tube users have to put up with the **** that comes from your exhaust pipes !



Because you don't pay enough to run the tube and who says there has to
be **** from the exhausts, not all of us run VWs, audis or skodas.

Why should the people living near the power stations put up with the
**** chucked out to run the tube? Its probably more than cars to move
the same number of people.