On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 22:32:34 +0000, Tim Streater
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Monday, 12 February 2018 18:26:46 UTC, T i m wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:09:18 -0800 (PST), tabbypurr wrote:

snip

Thanks goodness for that. Another lot of hot air I don't have to
bother questioning.


you're as lost as ever.

Right, direct Brexiteer challenge, just to probe how lost you aren't?

Q1. What things did you vote for when ticking the 'Leave' box?

I already answered this:

Not all the levels you didn't and in a coherent way.

no SM, no CU, no ECJ, no dosh to Brussels, no
more EU laws.

Ok, thanks.

Q2. Of the things you think you voted for, how many of them do you
think you will get?

All of them, otherwise it isn't brexit.

Ok.

Q3. Of the things you think you are going to get, how 'hard / soft' do
you think they will be (were 10=very hard).

This is a meaningless question.

To you, left brainer.

Ok, lets say you don't get all of the things to 100%, are you saying
that 2 of them are only 75% (say we still have to pay something and
are still bound by a subset of rules), you would rather remain?

Q4. If you get the softest of all the things you think you voted for,
would that still make leaving a no brainer?

Another meaningless question.
Again, to a left brainer maybe.
Depending on how you answered my secondary question to 3), what if
(say) we were still paying 50% of what we are now and obliged by 50%
of EU laws, would you *then* consider we haven't left?

eg, We might as well stay as we were ... or ... it's still worth
leaving?

The only soft thing around here is your
alleged brain.

Yes, of course you are right, left brainer (that will case your brain
to explode because of a logic failure). ;-)

Cheers, T i m