On 20/01/18 12:28, RJH wrote:
On 20/01/2018 11:35, Huge wrote:
On 2018-01-20, Nightjar wrote:
On 20-Jan-18 8:19 AM, RJH wrote:
...
I have to accept that very few 'climate deniers' on this NG will read,
much less accept, peer reviewed work by trained scientists. But
blog-watching, the Daily Mail and hunches. Really?

What do you mean by 'climate denier':


Those who don't accept a link between human activity and climate.

Largely bvecause there isn't one.

They dont accept a link between the death of Princess Diana and lights
seen in the sky over S****horpe, either.

And they dont accept that the moon landings were faked in a studio



It's a meaningless phrase used by those who feel the world should be run
by them and people like them (using climate change as an excuse) about
people who don't.


Can't speak for everyone, of course, but the last person I'd want
running the world is me :-)


Given the above, that shows remarkable common sense



--
Labour - a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich
people
by telling poor people that "other" rich people are the reason they are
poor.

Peter Thompson