View Single Post
  #40   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
bert[_7_] bert[_7_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,556
Default OT Gridwatch - demand slowly ramping up

In article , Chris B
writes
On 10/01/2018 18:51, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:19:39 +0000, T i m wrote:

http://www.lightmare.org/the_law.htm

"114 You MUST NOT

use any lights in a way which would dazzle or cause discomfort to
other road users, including pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders"

Your missing the fact that cyclists think the Highway Code only
applies to motorists not all road users, including cyclists.

"In stationary queues of traffic, drivers should apply the parking
brake and, once the following traffic has stopped, take their foot off
the footbrake to deactivate the vehicle brake lights. This will
minimise glare to road users behind until the traffic moves again."

Yes, but I put it down to change in how people are taught to drive
these days. I was taught to use the gears in combination with the
brakes to slow down and use the handbrake. These days it appears to
be brakes only and hold the vehicle with the foot brake.


I think that debate could run and run. My instructor (40 years ago)
used to insist its wasn't a "handbrake" its a "parking" brake. If you
are not parked you don't use it (except if absolutely necessary for
hill starts).

The other camp argued that if stationary and you got rear ended the
foot would inevitably come off the brake and there was no knowing where
you might end up. With the parking brake applied you wouldn't go far.

I think both arguments have some value, so I'm not saying which camp I
belong to.

I don't think dazzle from brake lights was a thing when I learned to
drive. :-)

On the subject of learning to drive, and to go off at a tangent a bit,
if learners must be able to follow sat nav instructions is there a need
for a new international road sign
DO NOT FOLLOW SAT NAV INSTRUCTIONS
One to be placed on each cliff top.
--
bert