On 28/12/17 15:48, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

On Thursday, 28 December 2017 12:44:49 UTC, Java JiveÂ* wrote:
On 27/12/2017 23:33, Bill Wright wrote:
It's already changing

As usual, no reference, so, as usual, this is wishful thinking stated
as though it were fact, which, of course, it is not.Â* Details such as
timescales will hopefully become clearer, modelling will hopefully
improve, but the basic thrust of AGW will not significantly change
before you snuff it.

and so are public attitudes.

Public attitudes change all the time, but you didn't mention anything
about them in your OP, you just said 'anthropogenic global warming',
so as usual this is an attempt to move the goalposts.

You can fool all of the people some of the time...

But when it comes to AGW, denialists can fool you all of the time,
because your attitude to it is devotional rather than rational.

When someone makes a reference to global warming these days it's
usually ironic, and it gets a laugh.
That just demonstrates the well-known phenomenon that like many
others you gather as a circle of acquaintances and friends people who
reinforce your own beliefs, no matter how idiotic these may seem to
the rest of the world.

By 'someone' I mean a real person, not one of the shills that seem
to get on television to the exclusion of those who dare speak the
truth.

That's because the people whom you call 'shills' are actually the
people speaking the truth.

Your pathetic irrational, unscientific **** has no place in a
technical and scientific newsgroup, take it elsewhereÂ* -Â* form a new
newsgroup called something like ...
Â* uk.agw.denialist.potheads
... where you can talk to other idiots without offending normal,
rational people.

oh the irony.

Well it's Java Jive, what d'ye expect. You'll note the total lack of
evidence in the post, just rhetoric.

I just updated my killfile to include him.



--
Karl Marx said religion is the opium of the people.
But Marxism is the crack cocaine.