In article , Iggy caedfaa9ed1216d60ef78
scribeth thus
replying to John Rumm, Iggy wrote:
1 - I didn't go off on any tangent. You seem to think Earthing is only ever a
1-way road and here you are telling people that I'm talking gibberish by
saying some appliances are Earthed, just to then confirm and tell me they're
Earthed...I know, I said it. You saying it to tell me I'm wrong is absurd.
That's how and why they get fried in a flawed Earthing setup.

2 - Like I said, if you aren't adding a 2nd rod and connection you aren't
supplying an inlet and are only supplying an outlet. However, by breaching the
building's natural insulation from what's going on outside, you now draw and
bring the outside in to create instead of avoid the hazard.

3 - Yes, adding another connection to the wiring system will effect everything
attached to it, because you're providing an in and out loop for the energy to
travel. Plumbing isn't providing any electrical source and is Earthed by
itself being in the Earth. Again, no inlet provided and only an outlet.

4 - Yes, this is what he has, in parallel or ONLY connected to each other with
just 1-connection. This, is extremely different than having multiple
connections to multiple rods...a proven disaster.

5 - Sorry, I misunderstood.

6 - Not where I'm from. Never ever should an electrical wiring system or
structure protection system be connected to a lightning protection system.
They are to be separate and even distanced from each other to avoid sharing
lightning's charge. I saw nothing to the contrary in your document, they make
it very clear that the lightning system shall have its own separated and
dedicated Earthing rods.

7 - See - 5.6.1 - What is protective multiple earthing? at
https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Book/5.6.1.htm this very clearly restricts the
use to the Utility Supplier and the last 2 sentences lock it out of public use.

8 - I've said my piece, you may have the last word.


You are w-tom AICMFP:!....

--
Tony Sayer