On 27/12/2017 14:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 27/12/17 13:04, Fredxx wrote:
I do think any claim that there are 26 "constants", when we don't know
the origin of these numbers, is a bit risky.


That sounds intelligent, but on close examination, it is completely
meaningless.

Then I looked at the poster...

You often trot out your defence of 'meaningless' when you don't
understand something, in this case a simple wiki page?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-v...ntal_constants

Are the words too long for your vocabulary?