In article ,
pamela wrote:
I don't think it's important to categorise an individual's
sexuality as 'normal' or 'abnormal'. It's just playing with
words. What's classed as normal depends largely on the societal
norms prevalent at the time. The ancient Greeks regarded the
man-boy relationship as entirely normal.

It's interesting how the words 'pervert' and 'perversion' have
become unacceptable to the PC obsessives. They are just being
mealy-mouthed as usual. If something has been perverted it has
simply been misused; used for something other than its intended
purpose. Since sex is intended for procreation, homosexual
activities are perversions. But so what? By the true definition
of 'perverted' the use of contraceptives is a perversion. Again,
so what?

The "so what" is.... the BBC should not foist these ideas on a young
generation to give them the impression that such aberrations are
morally acceptable.

Morally acceptable? Think there are rather more things to worry about on
that front first...

Although a liberal society tolerates such sexual deviants, their
behaviour is hardly something we should hold out for coming
generations to aspire to.

Good grief. Absolutely no one sets out or decides to become homosexual.
Anymore than they can choose the colour of their eyes. Apart from the odd
prostitute.


Otherwise what's next, bestiality as
acceptable if it doesn't cause harm to an animal? You know it's
wrong.

You cannot ask an animal what it truly thinks.

--
*Don't byte off more than you can view *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.