On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 18:03:13 +0000, Andrew
wrote:

On 19/11/2017 15:18, Mark wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 10:38:22 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
Fredxxx wrote:
You're showing your true colours. Not only do you want benefits for
the unemployed abolished or reduced, but you also rub your hands at
the idea of people losing their jobs.

Its human nature to wish bad things to those who disrupt your life
through taking selfish industrial action. If the union members were
unhappy with pay and conditions, they could just get another job.

Yup. A train driver can simply get a job as a merchant banker at 300 grand
a year. Problem solved.
Do love the way many think others should do such and such. But never
themselves, of course. Their job is essential and worth every penny.

It was one reason why Maggie Thatcher rose to power. A large section of
the electorate wanted Arthur Scargill to sport a blooded nose. She
kindly served that on a plate, the rest is history.

Yes it is. The current housing mess very much down to her. And so much
else. Making naked greed fashionable being the most obvious.

Absolutely right.

So, another 3 million people that NuLab allowed in, and the longest
period of negative interest rates had absolutely nothing to do
with fact that a £65,000 house in 1997 now costs £325,000 ??

We haven't had negative interest rates in this period.

How, precisely did Mrs T manage to achieve that ?.

Greed.

--
insert witty sig here