On Friday, 10 November 2017 16:02:01 UTC, Mark Allread wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 05:10:38 -0800, whisky-dave wrote:

On Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:22:38 UTC, Mark Allread wrote:

We have already established you are a tax avoider so you are the
same as anyone else who seeks to avoid tax.

How do you work that one out, or are you getting confused with
evasion ?

You have an ISA - you said so earlier had you forgotten?

Lots of peole have an ISA the governemtn alloow almost anyone to have a
ISA

Yep, legal tax avoidance.

So nothing wrong with that if advertised and avaible to all equally.


What you appear to be objecting to is the scale of the avoidance
which means you must have a degree of envy.

Well £3 million will help more than £3 quid .

Yep, envy.

No, I wouldn't want to buy a jet.


We are not discussing tax evasion but tax avoidance - something that
you and many others do.

and there is nothing wrong with that because it is legal and anyone can
do it.

Thank you!

Do you NOT understand the differnce.

I do and have done since the onset of this thread - clearly you have now
managed to understand it too.

I've know this for at least 5 years IIRC, perhaps longer.


We then get onto the rant which is supposed to educate and inform but
actually tells me a lot about the person who wrote it...

Who wrote what exactly.




Do you undertsnd the difernce bewteen killing someone and murdering them
or are you confused about that too.
Do you know the difernce between someone that is registared animal
slaughter and the croydon cat killer,

and

Can you tell the differnce between having sex with someone and raping
them ?

followed by

do you think it was OK for jimmey saville to do what he did with kids
because he was well known and had the power over the kids and some
adults it seems.
Do you think it ok that he coulld rape yuong children because he gave
money to charity ?

At which I see no further point in attempting to continue this discussion
with someone who clearly is foundering.

You mean I understand it and you don't which has been proved otherwise the HMRC wouldn't be looking in it it at long last.
It's like jimmy saville being allowed to abuse because anyone saying he was wrong in doing that will be bullied into silence and would not be believed..