On 09-Oct-17 11:34 PM, Martin wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 18:41:20 +0100, Nightjar wrote:

On 09-Oct-17 1:18 PM, Bill Wright wrote:
On 09/10/2017 08:02, alan_m wrote:
On 09/10/2017 04:00, Bill Wright wrote:
I haven't seen any. Seems odd.

Bill

Possibly because:
i) It wasn't terrorism
ii) It was an accident and the Police are not lo1oking for the driver
iii) All parties involved have been identified

But it was news, and anyone with CCTV could make a bit by selling to a
broadcaster or a newspaper website.

It was an RTC where people were injured, which makes it an ongoing
police investigation. It probably isn't sufficiently newsworthy to risk
publishing potential evidence.

The press had lots of photos taken immediately after the accident. I am pretty
sure some of the photos were also shown in TV news programmes.


Photos taken after the event only show the result of the collision,
which is not evidence of how it occurred. CCTV footage is.

--
--

Colin Bignell