View Single Post
  #41   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
[email protected] dcaster@krl.org is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,984
Default California: 11 Counties Have More Voters than Voting-Age Citizens

On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 10:16:17 AM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:50:44 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:14:08 AM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 05:50:17 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

National Voter Registration Act Of 1993

"Do States have to use the NCOA process to initiate the notice
process?

"No. States do not have to use the NCOA [National Change of Address
program] process. Under the NVRA, States must have a general program
that makes a reasonable effort to identify and remove the names of
voters who have become ineligible to vote by means of a change of
address. The program has to be uniform, non-discriminatory, in
compliance with the Voting Rights Act and must be completed 90 days
before a federal election. States otherwise have discretion under the
NVRA and HAVA in how they design their general program, and States
currently undertake a variety of approaches to how they initiate the
notice process."

In other words, good luck.

--
Ed Huntress


Under the NVRA, States must have a general program
that makes a reasonable effort to identify and remove the names of
voters who have become ineligible to vote by means of a change of
address

In other words there is a requirement. THere does not seem to be compliance. You asked about a requirement.

The same applies to illegal immagrants.

There is a requirment, but not much compliance.


There are two problems with this "requirement." First, states can't
remove someone for four years after they question a residency by the
mail survey procedure described in the Act..

Second, and stemming from the first point, they can't remove someone
even if they don't return the confirmation postcard, if they DO vote
in the subsequent four years.

In other words, it can't catch fraudulent voters if they vote in
multiple jurisdictions, unless they fail to vote in a four year
period.

Which makes the whole thing moot as a device to prevent multiple votes
in multiple states.

--
Ed Huntress


It says you have to have a system to remove from the voter rolls voters that have become ineligible. You either have a system or you are not in compliance.


Under the NVRA, States must have a general program
that makes a reasonable effort to identify and remove the names of
voters who have become ineligible to vote by means of a change of
address.

What part of this do you not understand?

Dan