View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.home.repair,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,alt.politics.uk
abelard abelard is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default After US Neurosurgeon Says He Can Treat Charlie Gard, the Baby's UK Doctors Still Think He Should Die

On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 11:14:14 -0000, "Phi" wrote:


"abelard" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:49:20 +0100, JNugent
wrote:

On 24/07/2017 11:46, The Todal wrote:
On 24/07/2017 00:19, abelard wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 12:23:43 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
wrote:

The death panel has spoken!

After US Neurosurgeon Says He Can Treat Charlie Gard, the Baby's UK
Doctors
Still Think He Should Die

Earlier this week, an American neurosurgeon flew to the U.K. to
evaluate
terminally ill baby Charlie Gard after a so-called E.U. "High Court"
ruled
the infant should be allowed to die.

Dr. Michio Hirano spent hours with Charlie and determined his
experimental
therapy could potentially help treat the baby. Charlie suffers from a
rare
genetic condition called mitochondrial depletion syndrome and has
apparently
suffered brain damage.

Dr. Hirano disagrees with British doctors that Charlie has suffered
"irreversible brain damage."

'brain damage' is very vague

and

'irreversible brain damage' is under increasing questioning
especially in the very young...


And every ****wit on the internet, including you, believes that they can
second-guess the decisions of doctors who specialise in these rare
disorders.

Including the one in the USA?

To me, it is absolutely incredible - and quite unacceptable - that the
NHS can decide that a child is going to die and that that is simply that.

The decision - whether via the NHS or the courts, or a combination of
both - that his parents are not to be allowed to seek last-chance or
emergent experimental treatment for him outside the UK (financed
charitable and privately) is a horror story.

Was this in anyone's mind when the NHS was set up?


yes...it fits perfectly the cult collective mind set...


There are probably millions of other parents with children who die every day
without medical support, why has this one any more importance.


because the parent chose to campaign and the fossil
media decided to promote 'the story'

and because it has fundamental 'philosophical' relevance

who owns the child?

is the collective to over-ride the freedom of individuals?

socialism puts the ant's nest before individual freedoms...
thus they 'feel' justified in killing millions for the cult
theories/beliefs

in the cult some animals are more 'equal' than others...

get in line and obey your masters


--
www.abelard.org