View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
trader_4 trader_4 is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,279
Default After US Neurosurgeon Says He Can Treat Charlie Gard, the Baby'sUK Doctors Still Think He Should Die

On Friday, July 28, 2017 at 9:20:16 AM UTC-4, Ophelia wrote:
"JNugent" wrote in message ...

On 24/07/2017 11:46, The Todal wrote:
On 24/07/2017 00:19, abelard wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 12:23:43 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
wrote:

The death panel has spoken!

After US Neurosurgeon Says He Can Treat Charlie Gard, the Baby's UK
Doctors
Still Think He Should Die

Earlier this week, an American neurosurgeon flew to the U.K. to evaluate
terminally ill baby Charlie Gard after a so-called E.U. "High Court"
ruled
the infant should be allowed to die.

Dr. Michio Hirano spent hours with Charlie and determined his
experimental
therapy could potentially help treat the baby. Charlie suffers from a
rare
genetic condition called mitochondrial depletion syndrome and has
apparently
suffered brain damage.

Dr. Hirano disagrees with British doctors that Charlie has suffered
"irreversible brain damage."

'brain damage' is very vague

and

'irreversible brain damage' is under increasing questioning
especially in the very young...


And every ****wit on the internet, including you, believes that they can
second-guess the decisions of doctors who specialise in these rare
disorders.


Including the one in the USA?

To me, it is absolutely incredible - and quite unacceptable - that the
NHS can decide that a child is going to die and that that is simply that.

The decision - whether via the NHS or the courts, or a combination of
both - that his parents are not to be allowed to seek last-chance or
emergent experimental treatment for him outside the UK (financed
charitable and privately) is a horror story.

Was this in anyone's mind when the NHS was set up?

==

Yes! It is a horror story! How dare anyone fight against parents' wishes
in a case like this.

A few weeks ago I had begun to think that those doctors were more concerned
with their own image and determined that no one, not even a highly regarded
Specialist gainsay them! I mean, what if the specialist was correct and
they were left with egg on their faces???





--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk


The specialist in the US, after actually examining the child and
the test results, essentially agreed that the child is advanced,
has suffered irreversible brain damage and that his totally
unproven experiment at best might offer some marginal improvement.