In article ,
Steve Walker wrote:
On 26/06/2017 23:58, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Steve Walker wrote:
The EU should have a responsibility to minimise the costs to the UK by
restructuring the projects, cutting them back if necessary or
re-organising funding - they have had sufficient warning to do so and
should not be continuing to incur additional costs for the UK. You can
be pretty certain that they are not cancelling the projects, just
expecting the UK to continue to pay, despite no longer having an
interest in the outcome.

They've had plenty warning? Remind us when article 50 was finally
signed?

They knew from the day after the referendum!

Someone else deciding to move the goalposts. The government could have
signed article 50 very soon after the referendum if they'd chosen to. But
chose not to since they had absolutely no plans for Brexit. But you expect
the EU to do things in the UK's favour.

--
*Generally speaking, you aren't learning much if your lips are moving.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.