In article , "Dave Plowman (News)"
writes
In article ,
Steve Walker wrote:
The EU should have a responsibility to minimise the costs to the UK by
restructuring the projects, cutting them back if necessary or
re-organising funding - they have had sufficient warning to do so and
should not be continuing to incur additional costs for the UK. You can
be pretty certain that they are not cancelling the projects, just
expecting the UK to continue to pay, despite no longer having an
interest in the outcome.

They've had plenty warning? Remind us when article 50 was finally signed?

And remind us when it takes effect and remind us who specified the
notice period in A50.
--
bert