"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:14:13 +0100, Mark
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:50:31 +0100, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:34:03 +0100, Mark
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:45:19 +0100, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:36:40 +0100, Mark
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:22:49 +0100, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:04:16 +0100, Mark
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:06:40 +0100, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:15:00 +0100, whisky-dave
wrote:

On Thursday, 22 June 2017 16:55:57 UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword
wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:52:14 +0100, whisky-dave
wrote:

On Thursday, 22 June 2017 15:47:46 UTC+1, James Wilkinson
Sword wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:34:46 +0100, whisky-dave
wrote:

On Thursday, 22 June 2017 14:26:07 UTC+1, James Wilkinson
Sword wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:42:23 +0100, whisky-dave
wrote:

On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 15:46:43 UTC+1, James
Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:04:39 +0100, Mark
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 19:46:31 +0100, "James Wilkinson
Sword"
wrote:

On Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:29:32 +0100, Dave Liquorice
wrote:

On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 09:25:04 +0100, Brian Gaff
wrote:

There are different crying types. There is
disstress crying and
frustration crying. the latter is one of lifes
lessons being learned,
the other is in need of urgent attention.

Agreed, shame that many parents don't seem able to
tell the
difference and give the child attention at the
meerest whimper.
Result in a kid that thinks the way to get
attention for anything is
to wail and if it doesn't work wail harder and
longer up to a full
blown tantrum.

Our two tried the tantrum once possibly twice, we
laughed, it didn't
work, they gave up on the idea.

M'colleague told me there's a way to stop your kid
being needy. You completely ignore it crying as a
baby and feed it on a schedule. It soon stops
waking you up at night.

Absolute ********.

No it isn't. When they realise that crying achieves
nothing, they stop doing so.

It depends on the reason for crying if it's for
attention and purely for attention then the crying will
stop. But the commenst reason(s) are teeth and the
resulting tooth ache amonst other things.

Which cannot be cured with a cuddle. So again, no point
in seeing to the baby.

But it can be cured by the parent or anyone else applying
medication and even if there is no medication it's been
proved that' kissing it better' can have the placebo effect
advantage and the pain or whatever was causing crying stops
it.

Easier to put the baby in a seperate room where you can't
hear it, then the parents can get a solid sleep.

I wonder if any did that in Grenfell Tower.

You're saying a baby started the fire?

No that they ignore a warning noise that something was happening.
Poepl wedge open foire doors, move extinguishers, get annoyed by
alarms going off and tend to ignore them.

Because alarms are **** that's why. They go off for false
positives 10 times more often than a real positive.

Only 10 times? I'd estimate about 100.

You're most likely correct. I just ignore them, except if they're
in the middle of the ****ing night, then I call the police and tell
them I saw a burglar, even when I know there isn't one. Hopefully
the police bash a clue into the heads of the morons with alarms.

Make sure it's fed with a clean nappy before you go to bed,
then it can survive for 8 hours without ****ing moaning!

well no one likes being woken up do they.

No, which is why mothers with the baby in their own room are
nuts.

Some people have the ability to care more about others than
themselves.

the baby doesn't need 24/7 attention. And giving it 24/7
attention turns it into a useless wimp that cannot take care of
itself.

It's not about 24/7 attention. Babies need to be in a safe place
and
the carer must be able to recognise quickly if there is a problem.

They don't need cotton wool. They're humans, not plants.

Cotton wool is irrelevant - plants don't need it for a start.

Your wit is unastounding. You know what I meant.

Actually I don't think I do know what you meant, unless you are
proposing that parents leave their babies alone for long periods of
time and ignore any crying.

That is precisely what I'm proposing, and many do.

In the Victorian era maybe.

The babies soon learn that crying won't get them anywhere.

Even if there is something really wrong?

But if you want a moany little needy child, then you carry on wrapping
them in cotton wool.

I really hope you never have children as you have the hallmarks of an
abuser.

You say that like abuse is a bad thing. Kids need to learn to fend for
themselves, or they never become adults. Cut the modern new age
treehugging be nice to everyone **** and grasp reality.

It's also fun to punish the little ****e when it ****es you off. Remove
TV privileges like you probably do, it won't care. Beat the **** out of
it, it won't dare do it again.

You wont either when you end up in jail.