On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 9:46:16 PM UTC-4, Doug Miller wrote:
trader_4 wrote in news:31956f90-4654-46d0-925c-fec853fbae19
@googlegroups.com:

[...]
And Bob is correct in pointing out that this example isn't a very good
one, because it does not show any people actually casting illegal votes..

That's because the Indiana State Police, and the voter registration boards, caught them
before it ever reached that point.


They could have prosecuted them for conspiracy to commit that further
crime, include it in the bundle, if they had evidence. It would
also be part of the evidence for the crimes they already committed and
would have typically been included in the prosecution, because it shows
a far worse, corrupt motive.





It shows people who made up phony voter registrations to meet quotas.

Well, that's the excuse that the Democrat prosecutor is giving, anyway. Ask yourself, quotas
for *what*?


Quotas for getting people registered. I could send people out to
neighborhoods that are high in Democrat voters, give them incentives,
eg pay them, have a contest with a prize, or quota to encourage them to sign
up people. It does not mean that I have any intention of having those
people register people illegally, register fake people who don't exist,
with the *intention* of using those registrations to cast votes.



No evidence that any of those phony registration were used to cast
any votes.

Of course not -- they were caught in time.


If you have any evidence that shows that the intention was to then
actually use those fake registrations, please give us a link.




And of course with this big investigation, big indictment,
if that had occurred, they would have been prosecuted. Instead the
DA says that they didn't find actual votes being cast.

Because the fraudulent registrations were discovered before the election.

And according to the prosecutor who actually investigated it and knows
what he found:

"Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry said State Police found no evidence of voter fraud or voter suppression and that the charges against the workers arose from €œa very bad, ill-advised business practice€� of setting canvassers what appears to be a daily quota."




Try sticking to the facts instead of ad hominem attacks.

Indeed, try to keep up with the facts.

Facts are above. What you're doing here is speculating, totally
contrary to the facts that were found by the prosecutor.