Election night banter thread
"Tim Watts" wrote in message
...
On 09/06/17 13:40, T i m wrote:
Now, the whole 'democratic process' really works (or can work if not
corrupt) well, where 'the people' vote out say a despot and replace
them with someone more reasonable, but when it comes down to trying to
pick someone / party out of a bad crop all offering and promising
similar things (when much of it is unlikely to come to fruition) you
can't really use logic / common sense at all.
My new theory is just vote for your MP if he's done good things locally
and for someone else if not.
Stupid approach. There are a lot more important things than local politics.
You'd get a load of people in parliament who actually did something for
someone, proved as good listeners and were capable of negotiating for a
result.
What matters is whether that result matters a damn for the country.
That would be a start...
Nope, its just mindlessly ignoring the bigger picture
and focussing on what you personally got out of it.
|