On 06/08/2017 01:05 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On Thursday, June 8, 2017 at 11:29:32 AM UTC-4, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Thursday, June 8, 2017 at 3:39:32 AM UTC-5, Pete wrote:
On 06/07/2017 08:59 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 6/7/2017 2:04 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 2:11:03 PM UTC-4, Muggles wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 12:48:13 +0100, Bod wrote:
It's not just her body anymore when she is hosting
another life.
Indeed, but it's still her body and her choice whatever
you think and has nothing to do with anyone else, bar
her spouse.
If you create a new life, humanity demands that there is value to
that life. Otherwise, how are we any different from the rest of the
animal kingdom?
We aren't.
You really don't see the human race as being any different from the rest
of the animals?

View life on Earth through the eyes of an alien and you'll see humans
are destroying the planet. No animal is guilty of that.

It's settled then. All humans must be eliminated to save Planet Earth!”Œ( à²*_à²*)”˜
That certainly would be sufficient, but probably is not necessary.
90% would perhaps do the trick.

Please wait until after I'm dead to experiment with exactly
what percentage of humans need be killed in order to save
the planet.

Cindy Hamilton


You could safely start exterminating welfare democrats since they
consume resources and provide no value in return.