On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 02:55:18 GMT, someone wrote:

... I should not be required to fix this, correct?

You may be confusing two different concepts when you ask if this is
"required". Required by WHO? Apparently it would not be "required"
by the city or town authorities.

But it may well be "required" by the BUYER. What does your contract
say, that you only have to fix violations? That they can only inspect
for violations and have to accept anything that is not a violation?
Or is it more open-ended? The buyer may consider this a "defect" or a
"shortcoming". So if the buyer wants it fixed, who is going to blink
first?

He is certainly not bound by usenet opinions.

-v.