On 2017-05-14, Shadow wrote:
Not one investigating him for voter fraud and treason.

Except that there is no such investigation. There may be an investigation
into allegations of Russia attempting to influence the election, but that
is a different matter than the President himself being investigated.

Of course no one has come up with any cogent explanation of how the
Russkies would have managed to pull off affecting the outcome of the
election. Did they hack into voting machines in all 50 states and change
votes? There is not a single district reporting any tampering or even
suspicion of tampering. There is no evidence that the Russians were even
responsible for the Wikileaks release of the Clinton emails, though of
course how could those have possibly turned the tide of the election
against her? Certainly if Mrs. Clinton and her staff are the honest,
hard-working servants of the public interest that the DemocRATs claim
they are, the release of her emails would merely confirm this and would
have helped her.

So just what is it that the Big Bad Bear supposedly did? This is of
course a rheorical question. What the furor really is all about is
liberal assholes who cannot fathom that it is their own damned fault
that they lost the election, so they need to find a scapegoat. It's
*never* their fault when they fail, you see.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Blake (Posts from Google Groups killfiled due to excess spam.)

NSA sedition and treason -- http://www.DeathToNSAthugs.com
Don't talk to cops! -- http://www.DontTalkToCops.com
Badges don't grant extra rights -- http://www.CopBlock.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------