On 26/04/17 16:46, TimW wrote:
On 25/04/17 21:05, Rod Speed wrote:


"critcher" wrote in message
news
On 25/04/2017 10:43, Rod Speed wrote:


"TimW" wrote in message
news On 24/04/17 17:28, Richard wrote:
"TimW" wrote in message news
On 24/04/17 07:52, Richard wrote:
"TimW" wrote in message news
On 23/04/17 08:26, harry wrote:
[snipped Harry]
Responding to the title only, I happened to read Craig Murray this
morning on the Marr Interview with Corbyn:


Talk about flawed?

How many states have so far ensured their own destruction by not
having Nuclear Weapons? I think none.

In what sense is the destruction of the entire human race

Not even possible.

oh it is extremely possible,

Nope.

take away supermarkets and shops from us and most would be ****ed,

Most isnt all.

destroy the supply chains and god help society in advanced countries
like ours.

Plenty survived those getting ****ed over at the end of WW2
in the losing countrys. Sure, lots starved to death in Japan etc
but nothing even remotely like everyone died there.

Didnt happen in the worst famines where some even
resorted to eating their kids, quite literally. Usually
swapping kids so you didnt have to eat your own.

a better result than the destruction of some of them?

That didnt even happen with the Japs.


The domesday scenario normally associated with nuclear war is a nuclear
winter which would bring about mass extinctions of all kinds of animals,
probs us included.

Except that a 'nuclear winter' cant really happen. Its more hollywood tosh.

TW


--
The biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly
diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential
survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations
into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with
what it actually is.