On 25/04/2017 11:06, bert wrote:
In article , John
Rumm writes
On 24/04/2017 19:33, critcher wrote:
On 24/04/2017 18:07, bert wrote:


No one is saying they are inherently bad, but they are only good if you
want them.

There should be a minimum term for employment contracts, perhaps 15
hours per week, and if you want to go below that then it should be your
right to negotiate that with your employer.

And what if the employer can't offer 15 hours a week? The choice may
be 10 hours/week or none. You seem to be suggesting that legislating
so that "none" is the only option on offer. Who benefits from that?



Self righteous socialists who put ideology before the well-being of
their own followers.

don't be so silly