On 25/04/17 10:46, TimW wrote:
On 25/04/17 10:12, TimW wrote:
On 24/04/17 17:28, Richard wrote:
"TimW" wrote in message news
On 24/04/17 07:52, Richard wrote:
"TimW" wrote in message news
On 23/04/17 08:26, harry wrote:
[snipped Harry]
Responding to the title only, I happened to read Craig Murray this
morning on the Marr Interview with Corbyn:

" ...he went for the tabloid favourite. Would Corbyn push the button
and fire nuclear missiles? It says a very great deal about our
politics that it is taken by the media establishment as axiomatic
that
anybody who will not participate in the probable destruction of the
entire human race, is the crazy person in the room."

He does have a point.
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archi...byn-conundrum/

TW

Perhaps he does, but it is flawed.
Are you prepared to simply die to let an enemy succeed?
Beachy Head is that way

Don't understand that at all.

Mutually assured destruction is possibly mad, but better than unilateral
destruction by the other side.
The person who will not participate in the deployment of the deterrent
is taking a suicidal stance.


Talk about flawed?

How many states have so far ensured their own destruction by not having
Nuclear Weapons? I think none.
In what sense is the destruction of the entire human race a better
result than the destruction of some of them?
TW

And while it is on my mind - The USA has had a lot of Nukes for a long
time. Has that contributed to peace? Have those nukes meant that the US
hasn't needed to get involved in foreign wars? What about GB, we have
had one shoddy war after another? What about Iran? Israel? Peaceful? Is
North Korea's Nuclear program keeping the country safe? I don't think so.


Oh dear.

There speaks a true snowflake.

Have you any idea what 50 million dead looks like?

Wars have been local affairs since nuclear weapons came along.

And they cant be uninvented.

There is absolutely no point in dreaming about a world without nuclear
weapons. The world has the know how, and as Kim Jong Mc********face has
demonstrated, if a nation wants one enough it can get one.
Nuke are here to stay. Get over it, snowflake.

And one of the best defences against them is having more of your own and
being really prepared to use them.


At least be grateful that advanced targeting means the ones we have are
not so big.


And improved anti-missile defences mean we don't need so many

TW = Thik Wanka



--
The New Left are the people they warned you about.