On Thursday, 20 April 2017 10:17:56 UTC+1, Tim Watts wrote:
On 20/04/17 08:13, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 20/04/17 08:10, Tim Watts wrote:

More poles = slower and higher torque, less poles = higher rpm.


What utter ********.

Perhaps you should check your facts before you go slagging people off:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahlan...changing_motor

I'll accept an apology when you've read that.


This is totally obsolete technology.
I remember seeing a few such motors when I was an apprentice fifty odd years ago.

Completely irrelevant for traction.