On 4/12/2017 12:58 PM, Kurt V. Ullman wrote:
On 4/12/17 12:49 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:26:11 -0700, Taxed and Spent
wrote:

He would have never disregarded authority if the airline never demanded
he be removed for their error. I stated to you below, the authority was
wrong and heads are gonna roll for their unjustified acts on him. Being
a drama queen isn't breaking the law.


trespassing is, dram queen or no.

He wasn't trespassing. He paid to occupy the seat for a period of
time.

The airline revoked the license to use that seat and that makes it
trespassing. Now whether or not they should have is the other part of
the discussion.

That's where it's wrong. Why should they have the power to revoke that
"paid" seat outside the area of purchasers residence, especially without
knowing the circumstance behind his travels or requirement to arrive home.