On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:07:37 -0000, GB wrote:

On 24/03/2017 20:32, bm wrote:
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:24:29 -0000, alan_m wrote:

On 24/03/2017 19:08, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

They drove straight across the roundabout without altering course or
speed. I slowed down enough to let them pass. If I had continued, I
would have ploughed into the side of them. I had to make allowances for
their **** driving.

Why did you pull out in the first place? Even a mediocre driver would
have better road awareness.

Because he told me he was going left. The driver lied because he's
incompetant.

If you believe every indicator you see, you're more of a prick than I
thought.
And you call HIM incompetent?
Prick.

The Highway Code specifically states not to rely on other cars'
indicators, but to wait for clear signs they are actually turning.

Then it's contradictory, because it also says to use your indicators. Why use something other people are supposed to ignore?

Meanwhile in the real world everyone pays attention to indicators. I can't remember the last time I turned left and the person pulling out didn't believe me.

In this case, the van driver indicated that he was about to exit the
roundabout, which he did. Just not the exit the crackpot erroneously
thought he was going to take.

Van? The van was in front of me and indicated properly. I'm talking about the car going from my right to my left.

This is the second video the crackpot has posted of his own atrocious
driving, claiming that someone else was in the wrong.

He was in the wrong, he LIED about the direction he was going. Misuse of indicators is against the law.

--
A guy bought his wife a beautiful diamond ring for Christmas.
A friend of his said, "I thought she wanted one of those sporty 4-Wheel drive vehicles."
"She did," he replied. "But where in the hell was I gonna find a fake Jeep?"