Thread: You Have No Right to Own a 'Military-Style' Rifle, According toFederal Appeals Court Decision
View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
trader_4 trader_4 is offline
external usenet poster
  
Posts: 15,279
Default You Have No Right to Own a 'Military-Style' Rifle, According toFederal Appeals Court Decision
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 10:04:38 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:09:37 -0500, burfordTjustice
wrote:

You Have No Right to Own a 'Military-Style' Rifle, According to Federal
Appeals Court Decision

http://ijr.com/2017/02/807907-you-ha...ourt-decision/

This is contrary to "MILLER V US" one of the cornerstone decisions
upholding NFA34, the grand daddy of all gun laws. In Miller they ruled
that a sawed off shotgun was not "military" enough to be protected by
the 2d amendment. It will be interesting how the Trump SCOTUS rules on
this.

The Trump SC? King Trump now runs that too?

I agree it will be interesting, assuming they take the case of course.
The appeals court ruled that semi-autos are weapons of war. I'd like
those justices to show us modern armies that use rifles that are
only capable of semi-auto fire.
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote