On Wednesday, February 22, 2017 at 9:25:18 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:15:27 -0800 (PST), trader_4
wrote:

As usual, this isn't what the trumpet would have you believe. This doesn't say the benefits were not earned or received fraudulently. Example would be an 80 year old who worked 50 years for his ss, but because he's disabled, he has the payment going to his caretaker or partner, who has no ss number. Just the facts.

WTF are you talking about. Usually, you give a URL for a reference.
Are you okay?

It was BTJ that posted the excerpt from the article. I suggest you
direct your concerns about the lack of a URL to him. I just explained
what his excerpt really means.