In article , sms
wrote:


Out here in the Silicon Valley, coverage seems about the same for each,
although I had them in series, and not sequentially (except for a few
concomitant burner phones).

OMG. No way. Verizon is far superior in Silicon Valley and the Bay Area.

they're all about the same.

T-Mobile is useless outside the urban and suburban core, and their rural
coverage is far inferior to AT&T or Verizon, and it's gotten worse as
they've dropped roaming onto AT&T in the surrounding areas.

t-mobile's coverage is steadily getting *better*, not worse.




In San Francisco, my sister-in-law works at a major hospital close to
the Castro, and only Verizon works inside.

that has more to do with the frequencies used than the carrier.