"dennis@home" wrote in message
eb.com...
On 16/02/2017 08:30, harry wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 February 2017 14:53:37 UTC, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
They are, it seems, in dire straights financially. Due to problems in
the
US nuclear power generation field. And one of the major players in
proposed new stations in the UK.

So as the costs of installing renewables are falling, the costs of
nuclear
causes a chairman to resign.

Of course it could never happen here. Every major project always comes
in
on budget. Regardless of the value of the pound.

Nuclear power has never,and never will be,financially viable.


If they had as many regulatory powers on house building to make them as
safe as nuclear generation there wouldn't be any houses. Even more so wind
turbines and solar panels.

Yes.

The only economical way of reaching the goal of reducing CO2 is to kill
95% of the population.

Even sillier than you usually manage.