On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:58:00 -0800 (PST)
trader_4 wrote:

On Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 9:12:01 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice
wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:07:45 -0600
philo wrote:

My guess is not only would Trump not have passed

Evidence?

Must you ask?
How about the fact that Trump insists that he saw things that never
happened? That he participated in once in a lifetime type meetings,
that no one could get wrong, but they too never happened?
He says he saw thousands and thousands of Arabs celebrating in Jersey
City on 9/11. Fully vetted, never happened. He claims he saw bodies
fall from WTC from his apartment. The apartment is 5 miles away and
it would have been impossible. He claims he got to know Putin when
they did 60 Minutes at the same time. "We were stablemates". It
never happened, they were at different times, one in Moscow, the
other taped in NYC.

Then we have the bizarre, childlike tweeting, the self-admitted
germaphobia, the inability to ever admit that he's made a mistake.

Need I go on? When is enough, enough?

Your opinion not evidence.