View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
James Wilkinson Sword[_4_] James Wilkinson Sword[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,712
Default One income for all: far-fetched, or future fact?

On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 02:49:35 -0000, 01001100110 wrote:



James Wilkinson wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 01:20:47 -0000, 01001100110 wrote:


wrote:
Paris (AFP) - It is a utopian idea, literally, but is enjoying a renaissance as politicians and policy wonks grapple with technology-driven changes that could redefine our very understanding of work.
If robots and machine intelligence threaten to render many white-collar jobs obsolete, then what will people do for money?
Enter the concept of a "universal basic income", a flat sum paid to all regardless of your existing wealth or ability to work. It is one of the rare ideas that has support from both the libertarian right -- which favours tearing up the welfare state -- and the left wing.
In France, Benoit Hamon has emerged as the surprise Socialist candidate for April's presidential election first round, on a radical programme that includes such an income -- to be funded in part by a new tax on industrial robots.
National or local governments in other countries such as Finland, the Netherlands, Canada, Scotland and Brazil are already evaluating how such a revenue might work in practice.
Finland is furthest down the road. On January 1 it started a two-year trial to give 2,000 unemployed Finns a monthly unconditional payment of 560 euros ($590).
At the least, advocates argue, a basic income could replace the thicket of unemployment benefits currently on offer in many advanced economies. Those can, perversely, discourage people from retraining in new fields or taking on lower paid work that society needs, such as care for the elderly.
- Less is More -
https://www.yahoo.com/news/one-incom...041641247.html

A few months ago the was an internet article about an African country that offered a large segment of their population a years wages, something like $23.00, to be given every year, and they refused. I don't remember their reason for refusing.

I think it was on Yahoo news where I read it.

Your message contains an empty jpeg image.
--
How do you embarrass an archeologist?
Give him a used tampon and ask him which period it came from.


I don't see a jpeg image, where is it.


You didn't see it because it has no data, only the name of the file. The raw message ends with this after the text:


---=Part.0.3c0a2db7f8bb4c08.159fc68da1c.2916e63e2dceb 91d=-
Content-Type: image/jpg; name="IMG_20170201_191335_1333941358.jpg"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: 1485998447090AUR


---=Part.0.3c0a2db7f8bb4c08.159fc68da1c.2916e63e2dceb 91d=---