"bert" wrote in message
...
In article . com,
lid writes
On 04/01/2017 05:01, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 04/01/17 00:48, dennis@home wrote:
On 03/01/2017 22:43, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Andy Burns
wrote:

dennis@home wrote:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38391034

A carbon capture plant that takes CO2 from the coal fired plant and
makes baking powder. So what do they do with the baking powder..
they
bake with it releasing the CO2. Yet this is green and reduces CO2
emissions!

Well, for once it's a commercial deal that stands on its own two feet
without subsidy ... people are going to bake anyway, so it displaces
sodium bicarb that would be manufactured anyway.

Makes no difference to the CO2 issue.

It's like when greens claim that letting wood rot "naturally" instead
of burning it reduces CO2.


It does.
However some of the carbon ends up as methane.
Methane is a worse greenhouse gas.

No, it isn't.

It breaks down very quickly.


Into?
And before it does that it is a worse greenhouse gas.
You certainly wouldn't want much of it in the atmosphere.
And rotting veg adds a continuous supply.
BAIUI not as much as farting cows

Still rotting veg, just rotting inside the farting cows.

And it isnt just farting cows either, quite a bit
of it comes out the front of the cow, not the arse.

It most definitely is worse, it just isn't significant compared to water.

--
bert