"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
tim... wrote:
Actually you are wrong, we have batteries that are just about good
enough for short range cars. a single order of magnitude might be
enough to fly a commercial electric airliner to the USA.

Short range cars are no good as "main" cars

It depends. If 'they' tax the f**k out of diesels etc or ban them totally
in towns, they might be the only option for commuter journeys.

Yeah right.

Ban petrol cars whilst the alternatives all cost over 40 grand

Let the rich drive into town whilst the poor have to walk - gonna be a real
vote winner that, isn't it?

Plenty of fast charging points would help too - as would some form of
easily changeable power pack common to all. And it's more likely you could
make a small battery vehicle with a decent range than a large one at a
more economic price.

the cost of the battery is much the same

To get 100% acceptance (which TPTB seem to think is necessary) they need
range and cost no more than current cars

The costs of various types of car - and fuel - is under government
control.

only if you subsidise the capital costs

something which might work to start off sales but can't be afforded if 100%
of sales are of electric cars

Two orders of magnitude ain't gonna happen with batteries. The ONLY
thing with the sort of energy density is atomic fuel.



well that's not going to happen for domestic transport, is it?

Turnip knows no more about what might happen in the future than anyone
else. And his guesses less well informed than many.

The idea that TPTB are going to let vessels with nuclear fuel in them run
around on normal roads driven by uncle Tom Cobley and all is fantasy

Physics tells us that. That's why I can say 'aint gonna happen'

So why aren't these same Physicists explaining all that to the
Automotive industry?

It's awash with money. It's not like the can't afford to ask

The motor industry ain't going to spend unlimited amounts on blind alley
research.

well they ARE spending the money

tim