On 19/12/16 14:47, Nightjar wrote:
On 19-Dec-16 11:56 AM, mechanic wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:02:25 +0000, Vir Campestris wrote:

On 17/12/2016 18:42, mechanic wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:47:37 +0000, Vir Campestris wrote:

There have been deaths from the evacuation, just as there would
be from someone falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing
a panic.

You think the evacuation was unnecessary? What would have
happened if there was no evacuation? You think everyone should
return to their homes and get on with their lives as before?

Go on then, HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE KILLED BY THE RADIATION?

More relevant to ask how many WILL be killed as a result of
radiation exposure. Some estimate 5000.


Only the nutters.

The criteria for the evacuation in the area of Fukushima was an exposure
level of 20mSv/y. Subsequent investigation of 1700 evacuated residents
showed that two thirds had received doses of less than 1mSv/y, 98% had
received doses of less than 5mSv/y, while just 10 people had received
exposures of more than 10mSv.

I have had more than that from cat scans and angiograms.

The French Institute for Radiological Protection & Nuclear Safety took
measurements that indicated that, outside the plant, levels were
unlikely to exceed 30mSV/y for the first year and falling thereafter.
There is absolutely no evidence for any adverse effects from an exposure
level below 100mSv/y and people quite happily live in areas where the
natural background radiation can give doses as high as 50mSv/y

OTOH, around 761 people were identified as having died as a direct
result of the evacuation.

yip. That's the sort of murderous **** harry is.Solar Panels and lack of
reliable electricity kills more people than nukes ever have.